Decision Making Processes for a Pregnant Woman Admitted to the Accident and Emergency Department Requiring Emergency Diagnostic X-ray – A Case Study
PDF

Keywords

Decision-making
case study
pregnancy X-ray
A&E
information processing theory

Abstract

The objective of this study is to apply the decision-making processes for a pregnant woman who was involved in a motor vehicle accident and admitted to a private middle-class hospital in the capital of Indonesia requiring radiologic X-ray examination.  It also aims to examine and evaluate the patient who was in her 20th week of gestation in order to provide her with the best emergency care, diagnostic investigations and treatments.The descriptive, normative and prescriptive models of decision-making are demonstrated. The descriptive model used intuition, while the normative model used decision trees as decision options and lastly the prescriptive decision used the information processing theory (IPT) to decide on the best emergency care, diagnostic investigations and treatments for the patient. The IPT dominated the decision-making process; hence an X-ray examination was done that was safe for the fetus and the childbearing mother. Decision option was not used since the patient was in pain and could not understand much of the procedure that was explained.  Intuition helped in the decision-making in order to ensure safe and effective practice.
https://doi.org/10.29037/ajstd.63
PDF

References

Bell, DE et al. 1988, Decision making: descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions, cambridge university Press.

cousins, c 2008, ‘medical radiation and pregnancy’, Health Physics, vol. 95, no. 5, pp. 551-553.

Damilakis, J et al. 2002, ‘Embryo/fetus radiation dose and risk from dual X-ray absorptiometry examinations’, Osteoporosis International, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 716-722.

Daniels, r & Nicoll, L 2011, Contemporary medical-Surgical nursing, 2nd edn, Delmar cengage Learning, New York.

Dioso, r 2015, ‘Decision-making processes for a do-not-resuscitate poisoned pediatric patient admitted to the department of emergency and medical services—a case study.’ ASEAN Journal on Science and Technology for Development, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 31-51.

Eskandar, o et al. 2010, ‘Safety of diagnostic imaging in pregnancy. Part 1: X-ray, nuclear medicine investigations, computed tomography and contrast media’, The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 71-78.

Eskandar, o et al. 2010, ‘Safety of diagnostic imaging in pregnancy, Part 2, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound scanning and Doppler assessment’, The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 171-177.

Hardy, m & Boynes, S 2008, Paediatric radiography, John Wiley & Sons.

Harrison, EF 1996, ‘A process perspective on strategic decision making’, Management Decision, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 46–53.

Hart, mA 2005, ‘Help! my orthopaedic patient is pregnant!’, Orthopaedic Nursing, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 108-114.

Høiness, P & Strømsøe, K 1999, ‘The influenceof the timing of surgery on soft tissue complications and hospital stay. A review of 84 closed ankle fractures’, Annales Chirurgiae et Gynaecologiae, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 687–694.

International Atomic Energy Agency Vienna 2014, Radiation protection and safety of radiation sources: international basic safety standards, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.

International Atomic Energy Agency Vienna 2014, Radiation protection and safety of radiation sources: international basic safety standards, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.

International commission on radiological Protection 2000, ‘medical radiation (IcrP publication 84)’, Annals of ICRP, vol. 30, no. 1.

kim, H et al. 2012, ‘Evaluation of effectiveness of new design lead apron during pregnant X-ray chest PA’, Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 441–445.

michelson, JD 2003, ‘Ankle fractures resulting from rotational injuries’, Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 40–412.

offredy, m 1998, ‘The application of decision making concepts by nurse practitioners in general practice’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 988–1000.

osei, Ek & Darko, J 2012, ‘Foetal radiation dose and risk from diagnostic radiology procedures: a multinational study’, in International Schoarly Research Notices (ISRN) Radiology, vol. 2013.

Quill, TE & Holloway, r 2011, ‘Time-limited trials near the end of life’, Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 306, no. 13, pp. 1483–1484.

Say, rE & Thomson, r 2003, The importance of patient preferences in treatment decisions-challenges for doctors, British Medical Journal, vol. 327, vol. 7414, pp. 542–545.

Shaban, r 2012, ‘Theories of clinical judgment and decision-making: a review of the theoretical literature’, Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 8.

Stiell, Ig et al. 1993, ‘Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries,” Health Care, vol. 13, pp. 15.

Thompson, c & Dowding, D 2002, ‘Decision making and judgement in nursing―an introduction’’, in Clinical Decision Making and Judgement in Nursing, churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh.

Whitley, AS, et al. 2005, Clark’s positioning in radiography, 12th edn, crc Press.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.